THREE YEARS AND MYRIAD LESSONS LEARNED - A LAYMAN'S PERSPECTIVE ON "THE SCIENCE" (TM)

By: Richard G

Your honor, let the record show that I do not endorse notions that viruses do not exist, that the immune system is merely a matter of scientific theory, or that the body can ward off illnesses with some "cleanse" or detox program involving essential oils or flower petals. I'm quite certain that the mechanical workings of the human immune system are very well documented and directly observed by biologists under fairly simple clinical conditions. We see the immune system in action by simply observing the behavior of white blood cells, antigens, proteins, phagocytes, etc. as they attack pathogens, bacteria, and other harmful objects either created by, or introduced to the body from outside.

That said, I am by no means a biologist. My scientific education ended with my failure to comprehensively grasp organic chemistry in grade 12. I mean, seriously, what's a mole, and doesn't it live in the ground? I do, however, consult regularly with folks who are far more qualified than myself in these fields of study.

I also do not doubt that a healthy lifestyle and a plethora of natural remedies can more than adequately substitute any need for strong pharmacological medicines and injections (in most cases) relating to human health. I strongly believe that our lifestyle choices, level of stress, frequency and consistency of positive social interactions, and overall wellbeing are the predominant determinants of overall health. If we are at a point where experimental injections, hard, damaging, potentially lethal drugs produced in a for-profit, crony corporation-controlled large-scale manufacturing paradigm are our first course of action toward a standardized, global public health solution, then we have very much misunderstood the fundamentals of human health. This ought to have been abundantly evident in the last three years as governments threw copious amounts of public funds toward ineffective "solutions," literally FORCING them into the arms of otherwise free (and healthy) citizens in a vain and hubristic attempt to master virology. All the while, corporations posted record-breaking profits as they usurped the role of mainstream media and sovereign governments. Setting aside the bigger picture - the more vague but compelling underlying agendas - and the obscene profit motives, certain truths ought to be self-evident.

Among them:

1. COVID-19 predominantly affected the obese, the infirm, the immune-compromised, and specifically those in the very elderly population segments (i.e. those who have already lived longer than average North American life expectancy).

2. In countries where there was virtually no vaccination, macro-scale health outcomes were often more positive than in heavily vaccinated, Western nations. Why? Legislators, Woke(tm), and crony capitalists will argue that, in those countries, folks lead less sedentary lifestyles and are in better overall health. Imagine that. That just proves what I mentioned above about the real determinants of positive human health.

3. Vaccine mandates have no logical merit and no place in free and democratic societies. They are the antithesis of democracy and fit better with basic communist dictatorships. If a drug could be produced (and this is a huge assumption that once more sets aside the profit motive and the wanton hubris of the medical community) that actually protects the infirm, the elderly, and the immune-compromised, then it should be reserved for their usage and their usage alone. If such a drug works, then only those who want to receive it ought to receive it. We live in kill-yourself MAIDS land, don't we? If I want to die, then you'll even facilitate it, right? But if the drug doesn't work and instead requires healthy people who are not at risk of severe disease to take it, then it's NOT A VACCINE and it's not a viable public health solution, let alone one that should be mandated under any circumstances.

4. If a virus is very deadly, then it cannot be very transmissible. If it's very deadly, it's unlikely that it will have a long incubation period or present itself "asymptomatically" in its host. If it's very deadly, then by simple mathematical analysis, it cannot be very contagious because it will kill its host before it has time to spread. Conversely, if a virus is very contagious, then it cannot be very deadly as it must allow the host to live in order to transmit. I believe we've seen this concept in action for millennia with things like the common cold, the flu, and other seasonal respiratory ailments that are likely transmitted through the air.

5. The era of smallpox, polio, and measles is largely behind us. The inconvenient fact remains that most deadly disease has been eradicated as a result of modern hygiene practices, environmental controls like clean water and sanitation, and other environmental factors that developed before and alongside modern immunization. Humans who are in good overall health simply do not need vaccines to ward off viruses that have existed in both human and animal populations since time immemorial. COVID was no different, except that it was likely lab-created for some (or several) nefarious purposes that corrupt legislators and public health officials refuse to publicly divulge, but that we are seeing play out in real time today.

6. When faced with a fundamentally weak airborne virus that mostly affects the obese, perhaps it's time to question our modern, woke(tm) propensity to encourage unhealthy behavior. Maybe it's time we stop screaming about how "brave" the morbidly obese are, and how living in a manner which only has contempt for healthy lifestyle choices may not be beneficial. As such, it is not up to the rest of society to inject drugs into their bodies in a vain attempt to protect those who WILL NOT otherwise protect themselves. This constant bending over backwards for the segments of society that wish to take absolutely no personal responsibility for their health, or for their lives for that matter, is fundamentally incompatible with freedom, progress, and well-being. Rather than elevating each other to be as healthy and fit as we can be, we are asking all of society to come DOWN to a level of ceaseless mass consumption of all that is unhealthy at the behest of interested corporations. It's the same with programs that lower educational standards so that everyone graduates from high school without being able to read and write for the purpose of equalizing the playing field for "disadvantaged minorities." I could write a whole other post about that, but Sowell does a much better job. Point is, we should aim to elevate society, not to dumb it all down to a point that everybody feels like they "fit in."

IN CONCLUSION, I maintain that 95% of my commentary over the past three years has very much stood the test of time. Contrarily, the opinions of mass media pundits and shill corporate salespeople have not. For what it's worth, it may be time you considered LISTENING (You know, now that it's almost safe again to entertain conflicting opinions for a brief minute).

P.S.: I addressed this post to "Your honor" as I am still engaged in legal battles on several fronts which aim to hold our governments accountable to their unbelievably damaging actions these last many years. If any of you Crown prosecutors are reading me, by all means, enter this into the record. You can handle English, right?

Image: https://www.terramater.at/productions/sciencetm/